Junip + Layers
Junip review data syncs into Layers, letting you sort by average rating, boost highly-rated products, and filter by review count without extra catalog setup.

What Junip + Layers makes possible
Connect Junip to reviews workflows inside search and merchandising.
Use review scores
Ratings can sort, filter, and boost products in results.
Boost top-rated items
Best-reviewed products can be ranked higher automatically.
Show social proof
Review counts and ratings can be displayed alongside results.
From review data to better social proof
Review data shapes search results by what shoppers love and trust.
- 1
Collect reviews
- 2
Sync scores
- 3
Rank by UGC
- 4
Show social proof
Key capabilities
Everything you can do when Junip data lives inside Layers.
Review metric sorting
Sort by review count, and by average rating where the app provides a numeric rating.
UGC-based filtering
Filter to products with reviews.
Rating attributes
Ratings and counts become first-class product attributes.
Review-driven boosting
Boost products with strong social proof.
Social proof
Highlight best-reviewed products.
More integrations
Fera
ReviewsBring Fera reviews and social proof into Layers to sort, filter, and merchandise by review count.
Learn moreJudge.me
ReviewsSync Judge.me review counts and ratings into Layers so you can filter, boost, and merchandise on social proof.
Learn moreOkendo
ReviewsUse Okendo quiz responses to personalize search and collection results by shopper preference.
Learn moreFrequently asked questions
How do I enable the Junip integration?
Open Settings, then Integrations in the Layers dashboard and toggle Junip on. Layers reads the review metafields Junip writes, so there is no extra setup.
Can I sort by average rating?
Yes. Junip writes a numeric average rating metafield that is sortable and filterable, alongside review count.
How do I backfill review data?
Trigger a catalog resync after enabling the integration, or use the Resync reviews button in the integration panel.
Something about Junip + Layers wrong or out of date? Tell us and we'll correct it.

